JeffJeff's Blog
22nd overall, Cohn and Daddam kick my ass!

Today's task was cancelled for what the meteorologists call 'weird-ass-winds'—it was blowing 360 on launch until we left around 3pm.

My 50 place finish yesterday (feels like an ouch, but my original goal was to finish top-50, funny how those expectations expand after a few good flights...) dropped me to 22nd overall. Just out of the top 20 (ouch) but hey, I finished 22nd in a PWC against the best pilots in the world!

Matt Daddam and Josh Cohn both had great flights yesterday, Josh came in 4th and Matt 20th. That shot Josh up to 21 overall and moved Matt into the top 10 at 9th place overall. Amazing for his first PWC!

All that said, yesterday was a weird and frustrating day. It was light and inverted with very low top-of-list—I don't think I got more than 100m over launch.

No one reached goal with the best landing around 6km away and most of us dropping out somewhere between 30 and 20km away.

In an FAI meet the day would have been seriously devalued and not worth much toward overall standings. But the PWC is scored differently. Each meet has a 'validity distance'—here it was 30km.

The maximum points available for the day is a simple formula of 50 x number-of-pilots-pass-validity, capped at 1000. So if 20 pilots fly past the validity distance, the day is fully valid, even if no one gets close to goal.

This meant that yesterday, scratching just a little bit more out of a cruddy day could earn a lot of points and move you fast up (or down) the rankings.

It's not the kind of racing I like to do. I prefer strong thermals and lots of transitions. In those conditions the race can be won by tactics and gambles—do you try a different line to cut off some pilots ahead? Is it time to bail on a thermal low and gain a few seconds, or is it better to top-off and glide over the heads of the next gaggle?

That's the stuff I like, the stuff that gets you thinking, guessing, and risking for an advantage.

Yesterday was a slog without many decisions. The guys who won fly _extremely_ well and flew very patiently (circling for a long time in a stinky-sewage-treatment-thermal), but there was definitely a large chunk of right-place-right-time.

So, with that bitching in mind, here is the surprising bit (to myself at least), I think I actually prefer PWC scoring to FAI/GAPP.

FAI/GAPP would have valued yesterday low so that bad conditions and a bad task wouldn't have impacted the overall scores very much.

BUT PWC scoring rewards the pilots who flew best on a given day despite the conditions and despite bad decisions from the Task Committee.

With PWC scoring it's really up to the pilots to make the best they possibly can of a given day and task and in a sense it's a purer way of declaring the best.

The people who scratched out 10km more than me yesterday flew better. And the luck component? Well, that's always there. You have to fly better than your luck.

Overall I've really enjoyed flying the PWCs with the big boys and I'm hoping my 22nd place in this meet will give me some better letters for next year and the chance to fly a few more!

Comments (0)
Starting to feel like Japan!

Yesterday we had our first valid task—a ~65km zig-zag along the main ridge with a big 40km out-and-back to the flats.

The task was an elapsed time individual start rather than the typical single-start-time race-to-goal. That's because the shape of the launch area—a long ridge, has multiple places to tank-up, but no one spot big enough to hold 120 aggressive PWC pilots waiting for the clock to tick over.

In general I don't like individual starts—most comp pilots hate them. Because you don't know when anyone started the race impossible to tell how you are doing or to get the competitive juices going by challenging the pilots around you.

That said, this is a World Cup and _every_ pilot is good, the vast majority far better than me. So I was able to make it feel like a race by just picking a glider a thermal ahead and deciding to catch them. It didn't really matter if they were ahead or behind me on time, they were flying well.

Despite high clouds and a sky that looked not-lifty to me, there seemed to always be something gentle and smooth (this is _not_ Valle) when you needed it.

In fact the part I thought would be hard, the push to the flats, was pretty easy. Gaggling with these PWC pilots is a bit of a mess. People are aggressive the way a Boston driver is aggressive, or a pit-bull with a baby in it's jaws. And they turn however they want which means that a gaggle of 30 gliders might suddenly decide to switch direction for a better core.

You have to be on your toes. The flipside is that you can trust the skills of most pilots so even when they get really close and cut you off, they generally see you and aren't going to collide.

That said, the scariest stinkiest slowest thermal of my life was over a sewage treatment plant on the flats. It really smelled like a shitter and it was light so we spent a looonng time in there. I was thrilled to leave, but on the wa back to the main ridge, I had to stop in the loo for another 20 turns or so.

The day had one critical transition back up the ridge to goal. I figured bouncing along terrain would be easy, but the sky was filling in with high grey clouds and all the lift was dying. This encouraged my to push my fancy new Boom5 (it likes to be pushed) and speed along as fast as I was comfortable.

But with little lift on the ridge I soon found myself 7km or so from goal and about 100 meters off the deck with a lemon tree grove between me and a safe landing field.

I decided to try one more thing—a run to the next finger which had a little sunlight on it and a turkey vulture soaring (but not going up) in the hope that _something_ was building.

There was the proverbial rabbit fart and I clung on for a few turns and maybe 50 feet. At which point Martin Orlick squeaked across the finger and joined me. Together we did the drunken-butterfly-of-desperation lift search pattern and eventually worked our way back up to base.

From there it was one more thermal and a long 10:1 glide into goal (did I mention how much I like the Boom5?)

Of course given the individual starts, no one knew how they'd done.

I was hoping for a top 50 finish (I had been flying slow and patient in light lift, and didn't feel especially fast). I was shocked when I saw the results: 12th place and first American in goal!

So why is it feeling a bit like the Japan PWC? I started that one out pretty well too (not as well, but hey, goal on the first task is nothing to sneeze at) and then bombed after.

Well today was a lot like the first day with many people, myself included, bombing out shortly after start. But a few pilots clung on and the skies opened. They are still flying as I write this.

I expect the day will be valid, if low scoring. With some _luck_ I may find myself top fifty in the cumulative, but I'm falling...

- jeff

Comments (0)
World Cup, Argentina

After my first World Cup experience, earlier this year in Japan (1 task, crap weather), I am _very_ excited to be in Argentina flying the final World Cup of 2007.

Unfortunately, things are starting off on a similar foot—we had a nice practice day yesterday, but today's task was invalid. The clouds where grey, and got greyer. I think 20 or 30 pilots made the first turn point (about 7km from launch) before the lift shut off.

The rest of us (include 5/6 of Team America) landed about 5km short of the first point!

This means today is invalid, not worth any points. On the bright side, I am still tied for first with the entire field :-)

Other exciting news from here:


  • SuperFly Sponsorship
    This is my first meet as a sponsored member of Team SuperFly.!

  • Boomerang5 & Genie Race
    This is also my first meet on a competition glider and my first time flying a pod—ain't sponsorship cool?

A few thoughts on the Boom5 and pod combo:

The Boom5 is _fast_. Much faster than the BoomSport. And on half speed (I haven't tried more) you feel it dive and accelerate. It's pretty amazing.

It's easy to launch and stability seems good, though I've only flown it in light conditions. We'll see how it feels in Valle in January...

The pod is niiiice. It's so comfy and warm. I was definitely worried that I'd forget to put my legs out and end up hopping through my landings. But so far no problems. 'Course I keep stumbling and tripping because the Boom5 is so much faster than the Sport and I haven't learned to flare hard enough and so I come in pretty fast.

The ground here is soft, so my stumbles have resulted in nothing worse than mud on the knees.

Here's hoping for sunshine tomorrow!

Comments (0)
archives
2009
March  [4]
January  [1]
2008
August  [1]
July  [1]
February  [1]
January  [5]
2007
October  [4]
June  [4]
April  [10]
March  [1]
February  [5]
January  [10]
2006
August  [6]
July  [7]
June  [5]
May  [3]
April  [1]
March  [1]
February  [10]
January  [10]
2005
July  [7]
June  [9]
March  [3]
email info@pacskyways.com | paragliding | hanggliding